Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
Autor/inn/en | Zumbach Harken, Nichole; Price-Williams, Shelley |
---|---|
Titel | Historical and Legal Considerations in Development of a For-Credit Internship Program |
Quelle | In: Journal of Experiential Education, 45 (2022) 4, S.477-492 (16 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift
PDF als Volltext |
Zusatzinformation | ORCID (Zumbach Harken, Nichole) |
Sprache | englisch |
Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz |
ISSN | 1053-8259 |
DOI | 10.1177/10538259221081669 |
Schlagwörter | Program Development; Internship Programs; Educational History; Court Litigation; Legal Responsibility; Higher Education; College Credits; Experiential Learning; Labor Legislation; Work Environment; Bullying; Student Placement; Supervision; Instructional Materials; Equal Opportunities (Jobs); Assignments; Guidelines; Evaluation; School Policy; College Faculty Programmplanung; Berufspraktische Ausbildung; History of education; Bildungsgeschichte; Rechtsstreit; Strafmündigkeit; Hochschulbildung; Hochschulsystem; Hochschulwesen; College; Colleges; Achievement; Performance; Anrechnung; Hochschule; Fachhochschule; Leistung; Experiental learning; Erfahrungsorientiertes Lernen; Labor law; Arbeitsrecht; Arbeitsmilieu; Mobbing; Schülerpraktikum; Lehrmaterial; Lehrmittel; Unterrichtsmedien; Equal opportunity; Equal opportunities; Job; Jobs; Chancengleichheit; Beruf; Assignment; Auftrag; Zuweisung; Richtlinien; Evaluierung; Schulpolitik; Fakultät |
Abstract | Background: This research outlines important factors in the development of a for-credit internship program by providing a historical context of internship work dating back to the original case of "Walling v. Portland Terminal" (1947), which outlined acceptable non-paid work of trainees, to more current applications of these labor laws in "Wang v. Hearst" (2016) and "Glatt v. Foxlight Pictures" (2016) then connects those legal precedents with current research in best practices. Purpose: The purpose of this research was to examine legal implications on for-credit internship programs and create recommendations based on United States law. Methodology/Approach: This work uses peer-reviewed research to support recommendation in internship development, implementation, and evaluation. Findings/Conclusions: Recommendations for programmatic implementation are made to avoid potential litigation against higher education institutions, faculty, staff, students, and internship placement organizations. Implications: These legal cases inform higher education and considerations in change to organizational policies and practices as it relates to fair labor, program development, and oversight of experiential education. (As Provided). |
Anmerkungen | SAGE Publications. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320. Tel: 800-818-7243; Tel: 805-499-9774; Fax: 800-583-2665; e-mail: journals@sagepub.com; Web site: https://sagepub.com |
Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |
Update | 2024/1/01 |