Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
Autor/inn/en | Tolma, Eleni L.; Stoner, Julie A.; Thomas, Cara; Engelman, Kimberly; Li, Ji; Dichkov, Aleksandar; Neely, Norma |
---|---|
Titel | Conducting a Formative Evaluation of an Intervention Promoting Mammography Screening in an American Indian Community: The Native Women's Health Project |
Quelle | In: American Journal of Health Education, 50 (2019) 1, S.52-65 (14 Seiten)
PDF als Volltext |
Sprache | englisch |
Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz |
ISSN | 1932-5037 |
DOI | 10.1080/19325037.2018.1552216 |
Schlagwörter | American Indians; Females; Cancer; Public Health; Health Promotion; Program Effectiveness; Screening Tests; Rural Areas; Community Programs; Satisfaction; Intervention; Cultural Relevance; Individual Characteristics; Health Behavior; Oklahoma American Indian; Indianer; Weibliches Geschlecht; Carcinoma; Karzinom; Krebs (med); Krebserkrankung; Gesundheitswesen; Gesundheitsfürsorge; Gesundheitshilfe; Reihenuntersuchung; Screening-Verfahren; Rural area; Ländlicher Raum; Zufriedenheit; Personality characteristic; Personality traits; Persönlichkeitsmerkmal; Health behaviour; Gesundheitsverhalten |
Abstract | Background: Breast cancer is an important public health issue among American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) women. However, there are very few published studies describing the evaluation of breast health promotion programs among AI/AN women. Purpose: To describe the formative evaluation of a multicomponent intervention to promote mammography screening in an AI community in rural Oklahoma. Methods: A comprehensive process evaluation plan with emphasis on context, reach, dose received, dose delivered, and fidelity was developed. Data collection included mixed research methodology and impact was assessed via one group pre/post research design. Data analysis consisted of descriptive statistical analysis and content analysis. The study utilized a community-based participatory research (CBPR) approach. Results: Process evaluation revealed a relatively high reach within the priority population for both components (clinic and community) and a moderate implementation. Focus group research showed that participants were overall satisfied with program implementation. The intervention was feasible to implement in real-world settings. Translation to Health Education Practice: Community-based evaluation of breast health promotion programs among AI communities is challenging, because one has to balance methodological rigor with practical constraints. An evaluation plan, mixed methods, and a collaborative approach are useful tools in conducting the evaluation. (As Provided). |
Anmerkungen | Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 530 Walnut Street Suite 850, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Tel: 215-625-8900; Fax: 215-207-0050; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals |
Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |
Update | 2020/1/01 |