A Decade of Study on Employer Feedback on the Quality of University Graduates

Autor/inn/en	Shah, Mahsood; Grebennikov, Leonid; Nair, Chenicheri Sid
Titel	A Decade of Study on Employer Feedback on the Quality of University Graduates
Quelle	In: Quality Assurance in Education: An International Perspective, 23 (2015) 3, S.262-278 (17 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	0968-4883
DOI	10.1108/QAE-04-2014-0018
Schlagwörter	Disadvantaged; International Education; Higher Education; Feedback (Response); Education Work Relationship; College Graduates; Risk; Trend Analysis; Employer Attitudes; Industry; Statistical Analysis; Qualitative Research; Educational Quality; Diversity (Institutional); Employment Qualifications; Foreign Countries; Questionnaires; Australia + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Internationale Erziehung; Hochschulbildung; Hochschulsystem; Hochschulwesen; Hochschulabsolvent; Hochschulabsolventin; Risiko; Trendanalyse; Arbeitgeberinteresse; Industrie; Statistische Analyse; Qualitative Forschung; Quality of education; Bildungsqualität; Employment qualification; Vocational qualification; Vocational qualifications; Berufliche Qualifikation; Ausland; Fragebogen; Australien
Abstract	Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to outline four separate studies undertaken in two Australian universities between 2003 and 2012 on employer feedback on the quality of university graduates. Higher education has expanded significantly in the past decade. The expansion has been in student enrolments with a focus on increasing the participation of disadvantaged students; the emergence of new kinds of providers other than universities; new modes of education delivery; and the internationalisation of higher education. The diversity of higher education institutions and quality issues require the assessment of graduate quality based on feedback from employers. The lack of such assessment on graduate quality based on employer voice risks the production of graduates with focus on success (quantity) rather than excellence (quality). It also disconnects the engagement between higher education institutions and employers to assess trends and changes in various industries and professions that require employer input in course development and renewal to meet the changing needs of the industries. Design/methodology/approach: A quantitative method using online survey to gather feedback from employers of university graduates was used. The survey tool has been previously used in other studies. Findings: A decade of study using quantitative and qualitative methods with different employers in two different geographic locations clearly shows that employer views on the quality of university graduates in a range of capabilities have remained consistent. The study also outlines the challenges in gathering feedback from employers and how data are used in curriculum reviews and enhancements. Research limitations/implications: The study has a number of limitations, including gathering up-to-date employer data, and engagement of employers in the survey. Practical implications: Practical implications could include the use of survey data in new course developments, review of courses and further enhancement to ensure course relevance. Originality/value: This is the first longitudinal study undertaken using the same survey instrument in two universities. The study engaged 485 employers. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Emerald Group Publishing Limited. Howard House, Wagon Lane, Bingley, West Yorkshire, BD16 1WA, UK. Tel: +44-1274-777700; Fax: +44-1274-785201; e-mail: emerald@emeraldinsight.com; Web site: http://www.emeraldinsight.com
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2020/1/01