Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
Autor/inn/en | McKnight, Lucinda; Bennett, Sue; Webster, Scott |
---|---|
Titel | Quality and Tyranny: Competing Discourses around a Compulsory Rubric |
Quelle | In: Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45 (2020) 8, S.1192-1204 (13 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift
PDF als Volltext |
Zusatzinformation | ORCID (McKnight, Lucinda) ORCID (Bennett, Sue) |
Sprache | englisch |
Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz |
ISSN | 0260-2938 |
DOI | 10.1080/02602938.2020.1730764 |
Schlagwörter | Scoring Rubrics; Performance Based Assessment; Academic Freedom; Foreign Countries; Conflict; 21st Century Skills; Indigenous Populations; Praxis; Creativity; Student Evaluation; Preservice Teacher Education; Australia |
Abstract | This article takes the introduction of a compulsory rubric for assessment across all units taught in an arts and education faculty as an opportunity for the identification and discussion of competing discourses around this process. We identify five discourses that complicate those of quality and efficiency in relation to rubrics: imperatives for twenty-first century learning; authentic assessment; Indigenous perspectives; creative praxis and academic freedom. Through describing the resulting discursive conflict we demonstrate what needs to be negotiated in this particular context, for all staff, with implications for those experiencing similar tensions in their own contexts. We also consider what these tensions both enable and constrain for future assessment policy and practice. (As Provided). |
Anmerkungen | Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 530 Walnut Street Suite 850, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Tel: 215-625-8900; Fax: 215-207-0050; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals |
Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |
Update | 2024/1/01 |