Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
Autor/in | Magno, Carlo |
---|---|
Titel | Korean Students' Language Learning Strategies and Years of Studying English as Predictors of Proficiency in English |
Quelle | 2 (2010), S.39-61 (23 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift
PDF als Volltext |
Sprache | englisch |
Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz |
ISSN | 2094-3938 |
Schlagwörter | Foreign Students; College Students; Learning Strategies; English (Second Language); Foreign Countries; Second Language Learning; Second Language Instruction; Predictive Measurement; Predictor Variables; Language Tests; Secondary School Students; Multiple Regression Analysis; Time Factors (Learning); Language Proficiency; Asians; Philippines; South Korea; Strategy Inventory for Language Learning Collegestudent; Learning methode; Learning techniques; Lernmethode; Lernstrategie; English as second language; English; Second Language; Englisch als Zweitsprache; Ausland; Zweitsprachenerwerb; Fremdsprachenunterricht; Prädiktor; Language test; Sprachtest; Sekundarschüler; Language skill; Language skills; Sprachkompetenz; Asian; Asiat; Asiatin; Asiaten; Asiate; Philippinen; Korea; Republik |
Abstract | This study predicted the English proficiency of Korean students using the components of the Strategy Inventory for Language Learning (SILL) and number of months spent in the formal study of English. There were 302 Korean students, ages 14-18, who were requested to answer the Strategy Inventory for Language Learning (SILL) and an English ability test. The SILL includes strategies on memory, cognitive, compensation, metacognitive, affective, and social strategies. An English Ability Test was used to measure skills on using grammar, increasing vocabulary, detecting grammatical errors, and reading comprehension. The multiple regression was used to analyze whether the SILL subscales and months spent in the formal study of English can significantly predict English proficiency. Only the compensation strategy and months spent in the formal study of English significantly predicted English ability. There was an increase in R (0.35) when the months spent in the formal study of English were added with the SILL as predictors of English proficiency. (Contains 4 tables.) (As Provided). |
Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |
Update | 2017/4/10 |