Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
Autor/inn/en | Springer, Matthew G.; Lewis, Jessica L.; Podgursky, Michael J.; Ehlert, Mark W.; Gronberg, Timothy J.; Hamilton, Laura S.; Jansen, Dennis W.; Stecher, Brian M.; Taylor, Lori L.; Lopez, Omar S.; Peng, Art |
---|---|
Institution | Vanderbilt University, National Center on Performance Incentives |
Titel | Texas Educator Excellence Grant (TEEG) Program: Year Three Evaluation Report. Policy Evaluation Report. [Executive Summary] |
Quelle | (2009), (7 Seiten)
PDF als Volltext |
Sprache | englisch |
Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Monographie |
Schlagwörter | Program Effectiveness; Program Design; Teacher Salaries; Achievement Gains; Faculty Mobility; Institutional Characteristics; Incentive Grants; Merit Pay; Merit Rating; Teacher Effectiveness; Educational Improvement; Improvement Programs; Educational Policy; Policy Analysis; Program Evaluation; Texas Programme design; Programmaufbau; Programmplanung; Lehrerbesoldung; Lehrervergütung; Achievement gain; Leistungssteigerung; Finanzieller Anreiz; Leistungszulage; Analytische Arbeitsbewertung; Effectiveness of teaching; Instructional effectiveness; Lehrerleistung; Unterrichtserfolg; Teaching improvement; Unterrichtsentwicklung; Effizienzsteigerung; Politics of education; Bildungspolitik; Politikfeldanalyse; Programme evaluation; Programmevaluation |
Abstract | The Texas Educator Excellence Grant (TEEG) program was state-funded and provided annual grants to schools to design and implement performance pay plans during the 2006-07 to 2009-10 school year. TEEG was implemented each year (i.e., Cycle) in approximately 1,000 high poverty, high performing Texas public schools. Performance pay for teachers entered Texas state policy deliberations during the 1980s, a decade marked as one of the most active periods of school reform in Texas. As early as the Texas Teacher Career Ladder program in 1984, policy makers attempted to reform the single-salary schedule and introduce performance pay for educators. Several lessons emerged from those first generation programs and played a significant role in the design and implementation of contemporary performance pay programs in Texas, such as TEEG. Specific lessons include the importance of (1) adequate, sustainable funding; (2) teacher involvement in program design; (3) rewarding educators for their contribution to student performance and professional collaboration; and (4) conducting independent, comprehensive program evaluations. This executive summary builds on the previous TEEG evaluation reports, presenting findings from three years of the TEEG program. Overall, the report discusses the participation decisions of eligible schools, the implementation experiences of TEEG participants, the manner in which performance pay plans were designed, and the program's outcomes. An overview of key evaluation findings is presented. (Contains 2 footnotes.) [For the full report, "Texas Educator Excellence Grant (TEEG) Program: Year Three Evaluation Report. Policy Evaluation Report," see ED510449.] (ERIC). |
Anmerkungen | National Center on Performance Incentives. Peabody College of Vanderbilt University, PMB #43, 230 Appleton Place, Nashville, TN 37203. Tel: 615-322-5538; Fax: 615-322-6018; e-mail: ncpi@vanderbilt.edu; Web site: https://my.vanderbilt.edu/performanceincentives |
Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |
Update | 2017/4/10 |