Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
Autor/inn/en | Shelley, Mack C., II; Schuh, John H. |
---|---|
Titel | Are the Best Higher Education Journals Really the Best? A Meta-Analysis of Writing Quality and Readability. |
Quelle | (2000), (27 Seiten)
PDF als Volltext |
Sprache | englisch |
Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Monographie |
Schlagwörter | Higher Education; Meta Analysis; Readability; Scholarly Journals; Selection; Writing for Publication; Flesch Reading Ease Formula |
Abstract | This study examined the relationship between writing quality, readability, and selectivity in 17 higher education journals. Readability was assessed through two indexes of readability. Data were analyzed using zero-order Pearson product-moment correlations, independent two sample t-tests, and analysis of covariance. Findings show that quality of writing and readability did not vary as a function of selectivity. Journals that were more selective featured significantly more complex forms of writing, and journals with more general topics were significantly more selective than those with a more specialized focus. Two appendixes contain scoring categories for the Flesch Reading Ease index and a list of the publications reviewed for the study. (Contains 3 tables and 30 references.) (SLD) |
Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |