Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
Autor/inn/en | Springer, Matthew G.; Podgursky, Michael J.; Lewis, Jessica L.; Ehlert, Mark W.; Ghosh-Dastidar, Bonnie; Gronberg, Timothy J.; Hamilton, Laura S.; Jansen, Dennis W.; Lopez, Omar S.; Patterson, Christine H.; Stecher, Brian M.; Taylor, Lori L. |
---|---|
Institution | Vanderbilt University, National Center on Performance Incentives |
Titel | Texas Educator Excellence Grant (TEEG) Program: Year One Evaluation Report. Policy Evaluation Report |
Quelle | (2008), (161 Seiten)
PDF als Volltext |
Zusatzinformation | Weitere Informationen |
Sprache | englisch |
Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Monographie |
Schlagwörter | Quantitative Daten; Program Design; Incentives; Economically Disadvantaged; Academic Achievement; Teacher Collaboration; Teacher Surveys; Program Effectiveness; Classification; Grants; Program Evaluation; Motivation Techniques; Criteria; Performance Based Assessment; Teacher Attitudes; Teacher Behavior; Interviews; Program Implementation; Educational Policy; Instructional Effectiveness; Glossaries; State Legislation; Public School Teachers; Policy Analysis; Teacher Evaluation; Texas; National Assessment of Educational Progress Programme design; Programmaufbau; Programmplanung; Anreiz; Schulleistung; Lehrerkooperation; Classification system; Klassifikation; Klassifikationssystem; Grant; Finanzielle Beihilfe; Programme evaluation; Programmevaluation; Motivationsförderung; Leistungsermittlung; Lehrerverhalten; Teacher behaviour; Interviewing; Interviewtechnik; Politics of education; Bildungspolitik; Unterrichtserfolg; Glossary; Glossar; Landesrecht; Politikfeldanalyse; Teacher appraisal; Lehrerbeurteilung |
Abstract | This report presents findings stemming from the first-year evaluation of the Texas Educator Excellence Grant (TEEG) program, one of several statewide performance incentive programs in Texas. In June 2006, Governor Perry and the 79th Texas Legislature created the Governor's Educator Excellence Award Program, one component of which is the TEEG program. TEEG Cycle 1 provided approximately $100 million in noncompetitive, 12-month grants to over 1,100 public schools. Schools eligible to participate had records of academic success and high percentages of economically disadvantaged students. More specifically, this report provides an overview of TEEG school selection criteria, program design features of schools' locally-designed performance incentive plans, teachers' attitudes and behaviors in TEEG schools, and interviews with schools that decided not to participate in TEEG. Preliminary findings during the first year of TEEG implementation indicate that many of the traditional arguments against performance incentive policies, namely the negative impact on teacher collaboration and instructional quality, were not reported by teachers in Cycle 1 schools. While these findings do offer insight into the early experiences of educators, authors caution that it is too soon to attribute those findings to the TEEG program itself. The following are appended: (1) NAEP [National Assessment of Educational Progress] Analyses by Student Subgroups; (2) Overview of State Performance Incentive Programs; (3) Executive, Legislative, and Regulatory Division Interviewees; (4) TEEG Selection Process, Further Analyses; (5) Glossary of TEEG Taxonomy Components; (6) Overview of TEEG Taxonomy Findings; (7) Spring 2007 TEEG Teacher Surveys; and (8) Declining TEEG Interview Protocol. (Contains 60 tables, 11 figures, and 55 footnotes.) (As Provided). |
Anmerkungen | National Center on Performance Incentives. Peabody College of Vanderbilt University, PMB #43, 230 Appleton Place, Nashville, TN 37203. Tel: 615-322-5538; Fax: 615-322-6018; e-mail: ncpi@vanderbilt.edu; Web site: http://www.performanceincentives.org |
Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |
Update | 2017/4/10 |