Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
Autor/in | Rüschoff, Britta |
---|---|
Titel | Methods of competence assessment in vocational education and training (VET) in Germany - A systematic review. Conducted on behalf of the Federal Ministry of Education and Research as part of the ASCOT. Gefälligkeitsübersetzung: Methoden der Kompetenzfeststellung in der beruflichen Bildung in Deutschland. Eine systematische Bestandsaufnahme : Durchgeführt im Auftrag des Bundesministeriums für Bildung und Forschung im Rahmen der Forschungs- und Transferinitiative ASCOT+. |
Quelle | Bonn: Bundesinstitut für Berufsbildung (2022), 52 S.
PDF als Volltext (1); PDF als Volltext (2); PDF als Volltext (3) |
Reihe | Wissenschaftliche Diskussionspapiere / Bundesinstitut für Berufsbildung. 237 |
Beigaben | Diagramme |
Zusatzinformation | Inhaltsverzeichnis |
Sprache | englisch |
Dokumenttyp | online; Monographie |
ISBN | 978-3-8474-2911-1; 978-3-96208-324-3 |
URN | urn:nbn:de:0035-0971-1 |
Schlagwörter | Allgemeinbildung; Kompetenz; Reliabilität; Validität; Kognitive Kompetenz; Fachkenntnisse; Prüfung; Computerprogramm; Berufsausbildung; Berufliche Qualifikation; Gesundheitsberuf; Industrieberuf; Kaufmännischer Beruf; Technischer Beruf; Begriffsdefinition; Bewertung; Auszubildender; Deutschland |
Abstract | "The present study provides a systematic overview of the methods of competence assessment in German vocational education and training (VET). To this end, 58 publications from the years 2001 to 2017 have been reviewed regarding the occupational areas for which assessment instruments were developed, types of competencies that were assessed, the types of instruments used to assess the competencies and the psychometric properties of these instruments. The results indicate that the instruments described in the reviewed publications particularly address commercial, industrial-technical and health occupations. The majority of the instruments deal with the identification of professional competencies (66%), followed by basic (24%) and social/communicative competencies (9%). Most instruments employed paper-and-pencil or computerised assessment methods with a clear trend towards computerised procedures. In most cases, the instruments were subjected to at least one type of validation. The reliabilities of the instruments varied greatly in some cases. In conclusion, this study shows that there is already a sound base of instruments available for the assessment of competence in German vocational education and training. However, the instruments should be extended to cover a broader range of occupational areas and subjected to additional validation and piloting prior to a potential large-scale transfer." The study refers to the period 2001-2017. (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku).. |
Erfasst von | Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung, Nürnberg |
Update | 2023/1 |