Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
Autor/in | Murray, Frank |
---|---|
Titel | Counter-Intuitive Findings from Teacher Education Accreditation Council's Surveys of Candidates and Faculty about Candidate Knowledge and Skill |
Quelle | In: Issues in Teacher Education, 22 (2013) 2, S.7-16 (10 Seiten)
PDF als Volltext |
Sprache | englisch |
Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz |
ISSN | 1536-3031 |
Schlagwörter | Online Surveys; Teacher Surveys; Student Surveys; Teacher Attitudes; Student Attitudes; Accreditation (Institutions); Cooperating Teachers; Grade Point Average; Teacher Education; Teacher Education Programs; Pedagogical Content Knowledge; Teaching Skills; Program Effectiveness; Educational Quality; Teacher Competencies; Student Personnel Services; Knowledge Level; Cultural Awareness; Knowledge Base for Teaching; Multicultural Education; Educational Technology Schülerbefragung; Lehrerverhalten; Schülerverhalten; Accreditation; Institution; Institutions; Akkreditierung; Staatliche Anerkennung; Institut; Co-operation; Cooperation; Teacher; Teachers; Kooperation; Lehrer; Lehrerin; Lehrende; Lehrerausbildung; Lehrerbildung; Pädagogische Kompetenz; Lehrbefähigung; Lehrkompetenz; Unterrichtsbefähigung; Quality of education; Bildungsqualität; Lehrkunst; Wissensbasis; Cultural identity; Kulturelle Identität; Teaching theory; Theory of teaching; Unterrichtstheorie; Multikulturelle Erziehung; Unterrichtsmedien |
Abstract | This article is a report of the findings from a sample of approximately 2,700 students and 1,000 faculty in the first 50 Teacher Education Accreditation Council (TEAC)-accredited programs for which the online surveys were used. The sample represents nearly all the full-time faculty members surveyed and approximately 30% of the students. On the common questions in the surveys, the findings from all the cooperating teachers' surveys are indistinguishable from those of the sample (Murray, 2011b). The student sample also is representative of all those surveyed, as their grade point averages (GPAs) were insignificantly different from the GPAs of those reported by the programs about all of their students (as verified by the TEAC auditors on site (Murray, 2010). The results show that students and faculty rated all aspects of their programs in the more than adequate to excellent range (4.00-5.00). These results contrast with those of the prevailing narratives that teacher education is broken and that today's new teachers are unprepared for their roles. (Contains 3 tables.) (ERIC). |
Anmerkungen | Caddo Gap Press. 3145 Geary Boulevard PMB 275, San Francisco, CA 94118. Tel: 415-666-3012; Fax: 415-666-3552; e-mail: caddogap@aol.com; Web site: http://www.caddogap.com |
Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |
Update | 2017/4/10 |