Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
Autor/inn/en | Hou, Angela Yung Chi; Kuo, Chao Yu; Chen, Karen Hui Jung; Hill, Christopher; Lin, Shaw Ren; Chih, Jackson Chun-Chi; Chou, Hua Chi |
---|---|
Titel | The Implementation of Self-Accreditation Policy in Taiwan Higher Education and Its Challenges to University Internal Quality Assurance Capacity Building |
Quelle | In: Quality in Higher Education, 24 (2018) 3, S.238-259 (22 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift
PDF als Volltext |
Sprache | englisch |
Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz |
ISSN | 1353-8322 |
DOI | 10.1080/13538322.2018.1553496 |
Schlagwörter | Foreign Countries; Program Implementation; Accreditation (Institutions); Self Evaluation (Groups); Higher Education; Universities; Educational Quality; Quality Assurance; Capacity Building; Institutional Autonomy; Outcomes of Education; Educational Policy; Standards; Compliance (Legal); Efficiency; Taiwan Ausland; Accreditation; Institution; Institutions; Akkreditierung; Staatliche Anerkennung; Institut; Self evaluation; Group; Groups; Selbstevaluation; Gruppe (Soz); Hochschulbildung; Hochschulsystem; Hochschulwesen; University; Universität; Quality of education; Bildungsqualität; Qualitätssicherung; Institutionelle Autonomie; Lernleistung; Schulerfolg; Politics of education; Bildungspolitik; Standard; Effectiveness; Effektivität; Wirkungsgrad |
Abstract | In 2012, the Taiwanese Ministry of Education launched a new quality assurance policy entitled 'self-accreditation', aimed at enhancing institutional autonomy, as well as establishing its internal quality review mechanism. In the self-accreditation policy, higher education institutions are encouraged to develop their own quality assurance frameworks based on strategic direction and institutionally specific features. The study adopts qualitative and quantitative approaches to explore the impacts and challenges of the 2012 Ministry of Education self-accreditation policy over Taiwanese universities and accrediting bodies. There are three major findings. 1. Self-accreditation policy had positive consequences and outcomes on university's internal quality assurance capacity building. 2. Inappropriate selection processes of reviewers, arbitrary elimination of standards and indicators, inconsistency across review decisions are the challenges that self-accrediting universities encountered. 3. Under the new quality assurance policy, the roles and responsibilities of external quality assurance agencies should be redefined. (As Provided). |
Anmerkungen | Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 530 Walnut Street Suite 850, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Tel: 215-625-8900; Fax: 215-207-0050; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals |
Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |
Update | 2020/1/01 |