Rejoinder to MacCallum, Edwards, and Cai (2012) and Rindskopf (2012): Mastering a New Method

Autor/inn/en	Muthen, Bengt; Asparouhov, Tihomir
Titel	Rejoinder to MacCallum, Edwards, and Cai (2012) and Rindskopf (2012): Mastering a New Method
Quelle	In: Psychological Methods, 17 (2012) 3, S.346-353 (8 Seiten) PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	1082-989X
DOI	10.1037/a0029214
Schlagwörter	Stellungnahme; Structural Equation Models; Bayesian Statistics; Factor Analysis; Statistical Analysis; Training; Monte Carlo Methods; Markov Processes + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Faktorenanalyse; Statistische Analyse; Ausbildung; Monte-Carlo-Methode; Markowscher Prozess
Abstract	This rejoinder discusses the general comments on how to use Bayesian structural equation modeling (BSEM) wisely and how to get more people better trained in using Bayesian methods. Responses to specific comments cover how to handle sign switching, nonconvergence and nonidentification, and prior choices in latent variable models. Two new applications are included. The first one revisits the Kaplan (2009) science model by considering priors on primary parameters. The second one applies BSEM to the bifactor model that was hypothesized in the original Holzinger and Swineford (1939) study. (Contains 7 figures and 1 table.) (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	American Psychological Association. Journals Department, 750 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20002-4242. Tel: 800-374-2721; Tel: 202-336-5510; Fax: 202-336-5502; e-mail: order@apa.org; Web site: http://www.apa.org/publications
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2017/4/10