How Do Teachers Perceive Cheating Students? Beliefs about Cues to Deception and Detection Accuracy in the Educational Field

Autor/inn/en	Marksteiner, Tamara; Reinhard, Marc-Andre; Dickhauser, Oliver; Sporer, Siegfried Ludwig
Titel	How Do Teachers Perceive Cheating Students? Beliefs about Cues to Deception and Detection Accuracy in the Educational Field
Quelle	In: European Journal of Psychology of Education, 27 (2012) 3, S.329-350 (22 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	0256-2928
DOI	10.1007/s10212-011-0074-5
Schlagwörter	Nonverbal Communication; Cues; Credibility; Preservice Teachers; Cheating; Teacher Attitudes; Deception; Stereotypes; Predictor Variables; Models + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Non-verbal communication; Nonverbale Kommunikation; Stichwort; Glaubwürdigkeit; Prellen; Lehrerverhalten; Täuschung; Klischee; Prädiktor; Analogiemodell
Abstract	The present study explores how well teacher trainees can detect liars. Moreover, a new method was applied to investigate beliefs that teacher trainees hold about liars. The results indicate that, overall, teacher trainees were not better than chance in detecting true and invented stories. Generally, participants reported to have used only a few cues for their credibility judgment, where most of these self-reported cues are stereotypical and invalid deception cues (e.g., gaze aversion). Further analyses with a Brunswikian lens model showed that the self-reported cues were good predictors of their credibility judgment but only poorly predictive for the objective truth/lie status of the statement. Practical implications of the results are discussed. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Springer. 233 Spring Street, New York, NY 10013. Tel: 800-777-4643; Tel: 212-460-1500; Fax: 212-348-4505; e-mail: service-ny@springer.com; Web site: http://www.springerlink.com
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2017/4/10