Relations between Parenting Behavior and SES in a Clinical Sample: Validity of SES Measures

Autor/inn/en	Callahan, Corissa L.; Eyberg, Sheila M.
Titel	Relations between Parenting Behavior and SES in a Clinical Sample: Validity of SES Measures
Quelle	In: Child & Family Behavior Therapy, 32 (2010) 2, S.125-138 (14 Seiten) PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	0731-7107
Schlagwörter	Socioeconomic Status; Family Income; Academic Achievement; Validity; Child Rearing; Parent Child Relationship; Measurement; Mothers; Referral; Behavior Disorders; Social Status; Prediction; Parent Background; Educational Attainment; Employment Level; Young Children; Hollingshead Social Economic Status Measures + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Socio-economic status; Sozioökonomischer Status; Familieneinkommen; Schulleistung; Gültigkeit; Kindererziehung; Parents-child relationship; Parent-child-relation; Parent-child relationship; Eltern-Kind-Beziehung; Messverfahren; Mother; Mutter; Sozialer Status; Vorhersage; Elternhaus; Bildungsabschluss; Bildungsgut; Beschäftigungsgrad; Frühe Kindheit
Abstract	Two common methods of measuring socioeconomic status (SES) were examined in relation to observed parenting behaviors in a clinical sample of 89 mothers of 3- to 6-year-olds referred for treatment of oppositional defiant disorder. Families were 74% Caucasian, 9% African American, 5% Hispanic, 1% Asian, and 11% Biracial. Most children were male (75%). Parenting behaviors were measured with the Dyadic Parent-Child Interaction Coding System (DPICS) categories of prosocial talk and negative talk. Analyses were conducted with SES measured in two ways: (a) the Hollingshead Four-Factor Index of Social Status (HI) was correlated with parenting behaviors; and (b) family income, parent education (5 categories), and parent occupation (5 categories) were used to predict parent behavior. SES was significantly positively related to maternal prosocial talk. When SES was operationalized as income, occupation, and education, the model predicted three times more variance in maternal prosocial talk than the HI alone. SES was not related to maternal negative talk by either measure of SES. (Contains 2 footnotes and 3 tables.) (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 325 Chestnut Street Suite 800, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Fax: 215-625-2940; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2017/4/10