COVID-19 Scientific Literacy in Medical and Nursing Students

Autor/inn/en	Cabreja-Castillo, Maria; Hernandez, Leislany; Mustafa, Alicia; Hungria, Gregory; Bertoli, Maria T.
Titel	COVID-19 Scientific Literacy in Medical and Nursing Students
Quelle	In: Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 24 (2023) 1, (7 Seiten) PDF als Volltext kostenfreie Datei Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	1935-7877
Schlagwörter	COVID-19; Scientific Literacy; Scientific Concepts; Pandemics; Vocabulary; Misconceptions; Communication Skills; Decision Making; Medical Evaluation; Nursing Education; Medical Students; Medical Education; Hospitals; Case Studies; Clinical Diagnosis; Multiple Choice Tests; Professional Continuing Education; Diseases + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Wortschatz; Missverständnis; Kommunikationsstil; Decision-making; Entscheidungsfindung; Pflegepädagogik; Medizinische Ausbildung; Krankengymnast; Krankenhaus; Case study; Fallstudie; Case Study; Multiple choice examinations; Multiple-choice tests, Multiple-choice examinations; Multiple-Choice-Verfahren; Berufsfeldbezogener Unterricht; Weiterbildung; Disease; Krankheit
Abstract	The pandemic brought a whole newfound collection of words into our everyday language, some of which had been terms that were infrequently used outside academic and medical settings. However, as familiar as this new pandemic vocabulary has become, there are still several terms that often get mixed in everyday conversations, media communications, and even in the medical field. Some of these terms are often mistaken, which may lead to issues in the understanding of important concepts. Science communication, as a facet of scientific literacy, intends to educate people in an easy-to-understand manner, and this communication is even more important in health care, when a literate patient's medical decisions depend frequently on this process. In this article, we explore the use and misuse of some of the most common terms utilized during the 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic by nursing and medical students, i.e., future health care professionals, in the hospital environment. This single-center hospital-based cross-sectional study, performed throughout September 2022, included 30 medical and nursing students. All participants completed a self-administered 15-item anonymous questionnaire at a single time point. Nine multiple-choice questions evaluated knowledge, diagnosis, disease manifestations, and vaccines related to the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus. Six questions provided demographics and quality assessment information. The analysis of the answers indicated that for at least 75% of the population surveyed, COVID-19 literacy was better for terms related to technology and actions (3/5 questions answered correctly) than for terms related to the disease (1/4 questions answered correctly). The overall median score for questions 1 to 9 was 4.5 of 9 points in total. Based on the results, the language used in the questionnaire was considered easy to understand, with an easy to medium level of complexity, and the perceived time required to complete the questionnaire was less than 5 min. In conclusion, our results showed that efforts need to be made in continuous professional education to increase the knowledge in COVID-19 literacy in the health care environment for medical and nursing students. Larger studies are recommended to identify and to fulfill the challenges that COVID-19 brought to medical and nursing education. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	American Society for Microbiology. 1752 N Street NW, Washington, DC 20036. Tel: 202-737-3600; e-mail: journals@asmusa.org; Web site: https://journals.asm.org/journal/jmbe
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2024/1/01