Analysis of Category Level Performance on the "Praxis®" Earth and Space Science: Content Knowledge Test: Implications for Professional Learning

Autor/inn/en	Ndembera, Rachel; Ray, Herman E.; Shah, Lisa; Rushton, Gregory T.
Titel	Analysis of Category Level Performance on the "Praxis®" Earth and Space Science: Content Knowledge Test: Implications for Professional Learning
Quelle	In: Journal of Geoscience Education, 71 (2023) 2, S.208-221 (14 Seiten) PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Zusatzinformation	ORCID (Shah, Lisa) ORCID (Rushton, Gregory T.)
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	1089-9995
DOI	10.1080/10899995.2022.2138067
Schlagwörter	Earth Science; Space Sciences; Knowledge Base for Teaching; Knowledge Level; Tests; Preservice Teachers; Preservice Teacher Education; Student Characteristics; Factor Analysis; Regression (Statistics); Achievement; Teacher Certification; Teacher Persistence; Praxis Series + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Earth sciences; Geowissenschaften; Teaching theory; Theory of teaching; Unterrichtstheorie; Wissensbasis; Examination; Prüfung; Examen; Lehramtsstudiengang; Lehrerausbildung; Faktorenanalyse; Regression; Regressionsanalyse; Performance; Leistung
Abstract	A large body of work has shown that science teacher knowledge is one of the most fundamental components of effective teaching and learning. Our study analyzes the Praxis® Earth and Space Science Content Knowledge Test (ESS CKT) from May 2006 to June 2016. We present one of the largest datasets comprising 11,273 ESS teacher candidates in order to provide information about their demonstrated ESS CK. Understanding that the benefits associated with teacher retention outweigh the cost of hiring new teachers, our results can be used to design targeted professional learning (PL) experiences for pre- and inservice teachers. Findings from this study are particularly useful while planning inservice topic specific PL for teachers pre- and inservice ESS teachers by answering the following research questions (1) How have examinees performed as a whole in each category on the Praxis® ESS CKT? (2) Which personal and/or professional characteristics are most associated with examinee performance in each category and how does this inform professional learning? Examinee performance at the category level was analyzed through a five-part process: 1. Confirmatory Factor Analysis: 2. Percent correct; 3. Regression; 4. ANOVA; 5. Scaled points lost. Our findings revealed that examinees demonstrated strongest performance in the topics assessing "Earth's Atmosphere & Hydrosphere," "Earth Materials & Surface Processes," and "Tectonics & Internal Earth Processes" and identity "History of the Earth and its Life-Forms" as topics in need of support. Across categories, we found differences in achievement associated with undergraduate major, gender, and ethnicity. Test-takers with geoscience majors consistently lost fewer points than their out-of-field counterparts, that men outperformed women in the study, and White test-takers lost fewer scaled points than Black and Hispanic candidates. Our recommendations include reviewing our results for alignment with state standards in order to develop comprehensive CK development that will be used as an anchor for focused support on those topics where test-takers tend to demonstrate lowest proficiency. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 530 Walnut Street Suite 850, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Tel: 215-625-8900; Fax: 215-207-0050; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2024/1/01