A Comparison of Prompting by Exclusion and Delayed Prompting during Conditional Discrimination Training

Autor/inn/en	Cariveau, Tom; Ellington, Paige; Brown, Alexandria; Platt, Delanie F.
Titel	A Comparison of Prompting by Exclusion and Delayed Prompting during Conditional Discrimination Training
Quelle	In: Education and Treatment of Children, 46 (2023) 2, S.107-119 (13 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Zusatzinformation	ORCID (Cariveau, Tom)
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	0748-8491
DOI	10.1007/s43494-023-00100-1
Schlagwörter	Auditory Discrimination; Visual Discrimination; Training; Conditioning; Prompting; Cues; Tablet Computers; Children; Language Impairments; Program Effectiveness + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Ausbildung; Benutzerführung; Stichwort; Tablet computer; Tablet PC; Computer; Digitalrechner; Child; Kind; Kinder; Speech disorder; Speech disorders; Speech disabilities; Speech disability; Speech handicap; Speech handicaps; Speech impairment; Speech impairments; Language handicaps; Sprachbehinderung
Abstract	Previous research on training auditory-visual conditional discriminations (AVCDs) have compared several prompt types including gestural, positional, and identity-matching prompts. Other prompting procedures, such as those that involve the manipulation of the comparison array, have received less attention in the applied literature. For example, the target response may be prompted by removing the negative comparisons (delayed prompting) or by replacing the negative comparisons with known targets (prompting by exclusion). Prompting by exclusion may be of particular interest as several studies have shown that exclusion-based performances may result in the nearly errorless transfer of stimulus control and the emergence of the speaker relation. The current study compared delayed prompting and prompting by exclusion procedures using a tablet-based arrangement on the acquisition of AVCDs for four children exhibiting language deficits. Both procedures were consistently effective and similarly efficient. Additional research is needed to determine the clinical utility of similar prompting arrangements, particularly with learners who may experience challenges during conditional discrimination training. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Springer. Available from: Springer Nature. One New York Plaza, Suite 4600, New York, NY 10004. Tel: 800-777-4643; Tel: 212-460-1500; Fax: 212-460-1700; e-mail: customerservice@springernature.com; Web site: https://link.springer.com/
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2024/1/01