How Different Are English Learners from Their Native "English"-Speaking Peers? Evidence of Equivalent Lexical Competence in Classroom Conversations

Autor/inn/en	Hsieh, Hsiaolin; Wiles, Simon; Solano-Flores, Guillermo
Titel	How Different Are English Learners from Their Native "English"-Speaking Peers? Evidence of Equivalent Lexical Competence in Classroom Conversations
Quelle	In: International Multilingual Research Journal, 17 (2023) 2, S.87-106 (20 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Zusatzinformation	ORCID (Hsieh, Hsiaolin)
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	1931-3152
DOI	10.1080/19313152.2022.2118193
Schlagwörter	English Language Learners; Dialogs (Language); Elementary School Students; Secondary School Students; Verbal Communication; Peer Relationship; Language Usage; Word Frequency; Native Language; English (Second Language); Language Arts; Science Education; California; Washington; New York; Massachusetts; Oregon; North Carolina + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Dialog; Dialogs; Dialogue; Dialogues; Sekundarschüler; Peer-Beziehungen; Sprachgebrauch; Word analysis; Frequency; Wortanalyse; Häufigkeit; English as second language; English; Second Language; Englisch als Zweitsprache; Sprachkultur; Naturwissenschaftliche Bildung; Kalifornien; Master-Studiengang
Abstract	We address the concern that classification of English learners (ELs) primarily based on standardized tests does not accurately reflect what students know and can do with English. While qualitative classroom discourse analyses show that ELs' language-in-use is not as limited as test scores indicate, available evidence is sparse and prone to unintentional biases. Informed by sociocultural theory, we performed a series of quantitative analyses of student conversations during academic tasks at a larger scale. We analyzed 833 conversation transcripts between pairs of K-12 students in science and English language arts (ELA) classrooms. To uncover patterns of lexical resources in different interactions, word frequency and correlation analyses were performed for three dyadic configurations: two English-only students (EO-EO), two ELs (EL-EL), and the heterogeneous combination (EO-EL). Results showed that lexical size was only significantly different among grade-level bands despite EL-EL dyads' conversations being shorter in length in ELA. Relative to EO-EO dyads' language use, in general, EL-EL dyads maintained better word-frequency correlations in science-specific language, while EO-EL dyads maintained strong correlations in ELA-specific language. The findings suggest that attention to authentic language use between peers in class could be more informative than discrete tests and more effective to scaffold EL learning. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 530 Walnut Street Suite 850, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Tel: 215-625-8900; Fax: 215-207-0050; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2024/1/01