Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
| Autor/inn/en | Schooner, Patrick; Höst, Gunnar; Klasander, Claes; Hallström, Jonas |
|---|---|
| Titel | Teachers' Cognitive Beliefs about Their Assessment and Use of Tools When Evaluating Students' Learning of Technological Systems: A Questionnaire Study |
| Quelle | In: International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 33 (2023) 3, S.937-956 (20 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift
PDF als Volltext |
| Zusatzinformation | ORCID (Schooner, Patrick) ORCID (Höst, Gunnar) ORCID (Hallström, Jonas) |
| Sprache | englisch |
| Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz |
| ISSN | 0957 7572 |
| DOI | 10.1007/s10798-022-09763-0 |
| Schlagwörter | Teacher Attitudes; Beliefs; Technology Education; Secondary School Teachers; Foreign Countries; Self Efficacy; Student Evaluation; Teacher Competencies; Engineering; Technological Literacy; Knowledge Level; Formative Evaluation; Sweden |
| Abstract | In technology education, assessment is challenging and underdeveloped as it is a nascent practice and teachers do not have a well-defined subject tradition to lean on when assessing students. The aim of this study is to explore Swedish secondary technology teachers' cognitive beliefs about assessing students' learning of technological systems, in relation to the assessment tools they use. Data for the study were collected through a questionnaire which was completed by 511 Swedish technology teachers in lower secondary education (grades 7-9). The data were analysed statistically in three main steps. Exploratory factor analysis revealed underlying dimensions in teachers' cognitive beliefs, which was followed by correlation analysis to discern associations between dimensions of cognitive beliefs. Finally, comparisons were made between groups of teachers to discern how teachers' cognitive beliefs are influenced by their experience and educational background. The results show that additional education in the technology and engineering fields relates to more positive cognitive beliefs concerning teachers' ability to assess students' learning of technological systems. Teachers' cognitive beliefs about assessment therefore did not primarily relate to the content of technological systems per se but to increased engineering and technology competence more broadly, which may indicate the importance of a comprehensive technological knowledge base in order to be confident in assessment. Furthermore, strong cognitive beliefs about assessment were connected specifically to local, regional and national technological systems, which are generally well-known and visible types of systems, and to the human, socio-technical dimensions of the systems. Cognitive beliefs about knowledge for assessment were also associated with positive attitudes to assessment tools that followed the formative tradition, which may be explained by the prevalence of procedural epistemic practices and modelling in the design and understanding of technological systems. Technology teachers would need additional in-service courses in engineering to broaden their knowledge and increase their cognitive beliefs about assessment. Formative assessment should also be preferred, and it might be appropriate to begin teaching and assessment with well-known local and regional infrastructural systems with a clear socio-technical dimension. (As Provided). |
| Anmerkungen | Springer. Available from: Springer Nature. One New York Plaza, Suite 4600, New York, NY 10004. Tel: 800-777-4643; Tel: 212-460-1500; Fax: 212-460-1700; e-mail: customerservice@springernature.com; Web site: https://link.springer.com/ |
| Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |
| Update | 2024/1/01 |
Literaturbeschaffung und Bestandsnachweise in Bibliotheken prüfen
Permalink als QR-Code
Inhalt auf sozialen Plattformen teilen (nur vorhanden, wenn Javascript eingeschaltet ist)
Teile diese Seite:
