Learning Approaches as a Means to Understand Difficulties and Opportunities in Type 2 Diabetes Self-Management Training: A Qualitative Content Analysis of Two German Educational Curricula

Autor/inn/en	Healy, Karl V.; Weise, Solveig; Fink, Astrid; Frese, Thomas; Richter, Matthias; Knöchelmann, Anja
Titel	Learning Approaches as a Means to Understand Difficulties and Opportunities in Type 2 Diabetes Self-Management Training: A Qualitative Content Analysis of Two German Educational Curricula
Quelle	In: American Journal of Health Education, 53 (2022) 6, S.370-380 (11 Seiten) PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Zusatzinformation	ORCID (Healy, Karl V.) ORCID (Weise, Solveig) ORCID (Fink, Astrid) ORCID (Frese, Thomas) ORCID (Richter, Matthias) ORCID (Knöchelmann, Anja)
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	1932-5037
DOI	10.1080/19325037.2022.2120580
Schlagwörter	Diabetes; Self Management; Training; Foreign Countries; Teaching Methods; Curriculum; Course Content; Goal Orientation; Progress Monitoring; Health Education; Germany + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Selbstmanagement; Ausbildung; Ausland; Teaching method; Lehrmethode; Unterrichtsmethode; Curricula; Lehrplan; Rahmenplan; Kursprogramm; Zielorientierung; Zielvorstellung; Gesundheitsaufklärung; Gesundheitsbildung; Gesundheitserziehung; Deutschland
Abstract	Background: Diabetes self-management education (DSME) improves disease-specific markers (HbA1c levels and bodyweight) and prevents disease-related complications. Yet, patients do not seem to benefit equally from such education, likely because of differences in approaches to learning. Purpose: We investigated which learning approaches are best addressed by diabetes curricula and suggest improvements in curriculum design. Methods: Two of the most popular German type 2 DSME curricula were studied. We used qualitative content analysis to build a systematic coding frame, extracting and connecting categories of meaning from the material. Criteria for categories were drawn from research on learning preferences in adult Germans. Results: Both curricula mainly address participants preferring educator-guided and application-driven learning. One of the curricula more actively involves its participants with open discussions and personal goal-setting and shows a stronger emphasis on social support strategies. Discussion: Different learning approaches are not met equally in the curricula, which might create unique difficulties for participants of DSME. Translation to Health Education Practice: Introducing personal goal-setting and progress monitoring in DSME should benefit participants with passive approaches to learning. Offering additional course material could diversify teaching methods and satisfy theoretically driven people. All DSME programs should emphasize social support strategies. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 530 Walnut Street Suite 850, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Tel: 215-625-8900; Fax: 215-207-0050; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2024/1/01