The Experiences of Biology Education Master Students in Web 2.0 Content Development

Autor/in	Yapici, I. Ümit
Titel	The Experiences of Biology Education Master Students in Web 2.0 Content Development
Quelle	In: Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning, 5 (2022) 2, S.336-352 (17 Seiten) PDF als Volltext kostenfreie Datei Verfügbarkeit
Zusatzinformation	ORCID (Yapici, I. Ümit)
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
Schlagwörter	Foreign Countries; College Science; Science Education; Biology; Graduate Students; Masters Programs; Web 2.0 Technologies; Technology Uses in Education; Self Efficacy; Course Content; Measures (Individuals); Student Developed Materials; Learner Engagement; Retention (Psychology); Internet; Costs; Time Management; Science Instruction; Turkey + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Ausland; Naturwissenschaftliche Bildung; Biologie; Graduate Study; Student; Students; Aufbaustudium; Graduiertenstudium; Hauptstudium; Studentin; Magister course; Magisterstudiengang; Technology enhanced learning; Technology aided learning; Technologieunterstütztes Lernen; Self-efficacy; Selbstwirksamkeit; Kursprogramm; Messdaten; Merkfähigkeit; Cost; Kosten; Zeitmanagement; Teaching of science; Science education; Natural sciences Lessons; Naturwissenschaftlicher Unterricht; Türkei
Abstract	In this study, the effect of the activities carried out via Web 2.0 tools on the biology education master students' content development self-efficacy beliefs and students' views were examined. The mixed model was used in the study. The study group consisted of 15 students who took the course "Web Supported Material Design in Biology Teaching" in the last three years in the Master's program of Biology Education of a public university in Turkey. The data of the research were obtained through the "Web 2.0 Fast Content Development Self-Efficacy Belief Scale" and an interview form containing 5 open-ended questions. During the implementation process, students developed content with eight web 2.0 tools (Camtasia Studio, Prezi, Thinglink, etc.). As a result of the implementation, it was seen that the self-efficacy belief levels of the students increased. When the students' views were examined, the advantages of web 2.0 tools such as being interesting and entertaining, increasing retention in learning and providing rich content came to the fore. Regarding the limitations of these tools, issues such as lack of internet connection and hardware, technical problems, high cost and time management are highlighted. In addition, suggestions for the effective use of Web 2.0 tools in biology teaching, experiences in daily/business life and views about their favourite tools are also included. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning. Necatibey Faculty of Education, Balikesir University, Balikesir, 10100, Turkey. Web site: dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/jetol
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2024/1/01