Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
Autor/inn/en | Kuhn, Deanna; Modrek, Anahid S. |
---|---|
Titel | Choose Your Evidence: Scientific Thinking Where It May Most Count |
Quelle | In: Science & Education, 31 (2022) 1, S.21-31 (11 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift
PDF als Volltext |
Zusatzinformation | ORCID (Kuhn, Deanna) |
Sprache | englisch |
Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz |
ISSN | 0926-7220 |
DOI | 10.1007/s11191-021-00209-y |
Schlagwörter | Scientific Literacy; Evidence; Science Process Skills; Data; College Students; Metacognition; Thinking Skills; Mathematics Skills; Mathematical Logic |
Abstract | Schooling traditionally affords students more experience in learning and practicing procedures than in identifying what a situation calls for. When asked to choose appropriate numerical data to support their causal claims, college students perform surprisingly poorly. In one case we describe, almost all chose limited, inconclusive data as sufficient evidence, despite having available the more comprehensive data needed to support their claim and despite their established competence to employ such data for this purpose. Our objective in highlighting this weakness is to make a case that choosing one's evidence warrants the status of an important metacognitive intellectual skill and educational objective, one central to but that extends well beyond the domains of scientific and mathematical reasoning and hence warrants greater attention both in and beyond the science curriculum. People may choose evidence to justify their assertions in an ill-considered way, with potential adverse effects in both private and public communication. (As Provided). |
Anmerkungen | Springer. Available from: Springer Nature. One New York Plaza, Suite 4600, New York, NY 10004. Tel: 800-777-4643; Tel: 212-460-1500; Fax: 212-460-1700; e-mail: customerservice@springernature.com; Web site: https://link.springer.com/ |
Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |
Update | 2024/1/01 |