Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
Autor/inn/en | Rempel, Brian P.; Dirks, Maria B.; McGinitie, Elizabeth G. |
---|---|
Titel | Two-Stage Testing Reduces Student-Perceived Exam Anxiety in Introductory Chemistry |
Quelle | In: Journal of Chemical Education, 98 (2021) 8, S.2527-2535 (9 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift
PDF als Volltext |
Zusatzinformation | ORCID (Rempel, Brian P.) ORCID (McGinitie, Elizabeth G.) |
Sprache | englisch |
Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz |
ISSN | 0021-9584 |
DOI | 10.1021/acs.jchemed.1c00219 |
Schlagwörter | Science Tests; Test Anxiety; Introductory Courses; Chemistry; Group Testing; Cooperative Learning; Scores; Test Format; Outcomes of Education; Grades (Scholastic); Preferences |
Abstract | Two-stage quizzes and exams were implemented for both in-class quizzes and term tests in three sections of first-year General (Introductory) Chemistry. In the first stage, students completed the exam individually and submitted their papers. In the second stage, students collaborated with peers to complete a subset of the exam questions. The aim of the first stage was to evaluate students' individual knowledge, while the second stage provided an opportunity for peer-led learning. Exam scores were calculated as a blend of scores on the two stages, between 80 and 85% for the first (individual) stage and 20-15% for the second (collaborative) stage. Students' (total n = 129) written responses to open-ended questions in a long-answer student survey comparing two-stage and one-stage (in which there is only the individual portion) tests were qualitatively coded by thematic analysis, with themes developed through a grounded theory approach. The most significant conclusion was that students perceived that the two-stage test format helped to partially (but by no means fully) alleviate student exam anxiety when compared to a traditional one-stage test. Student responses were primarily positive about the two-stage format rather than negative about the one-stage format. The most common themes that emerged from student responses centered on: (1) improvement in grades, (2) positive discussion with peers, (3) immediate feedback from peers, and (4) less (perceived) pressure. Finally, students also expressed a very strong overall preference for two-stage over one-stage tests. (As Provided). |
Anmerkungen | Division of Chemical Education, Inc. and ACS Publications Division of the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street NW, Washington, DC 20036. Tel: 800-227-5558; Tel: 202-872-4600; e-mail: eic@jce.acs.org; Web site: http://pubs.acs.org/jchemeduc |
Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |
Update | 2024/1/01 |