Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
Autor/in | Yell, Mitchell L. |
---|---|
Titel | Endrew F. v. Douglas County School District (2017): Implications for Educating Students with Emotional and Behavioral Disorders |
Quelle | In: Behavioral Disorders, 45 (2019) 1, S.53-62 (10 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift
PDF als Volltext |
Sprache | englisch |
Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz |
ISSN | 0198-7429 |
DOI | 10.1177/0198742919865454 |
Schlagwörter | School Districts; Individualized Education Programs; Emotional Disturbances; Behavior Disorders; Behavior Problems; Student Behavior; Public Education; Educational Legislation; Equal Education; Federal Legislation; Court Litigation; Federal Courts; Special Education; Students with Disabilities School district; Schulbezirk; Individualized education program; Individualisierendes Lernen; Gefühlsstörung; Student behaviour; Schülerverhalten; Öffentliche Erziehung; Bildungsrecht; Schulgesetz; Bundesrecht; Rechtsstreit; Bundesgerichtshof; Special needs education; Sonderpädagogik; Sonderschulwesen; Student; Students; Disability; Disabilities; Schüler; Schülerin; Studentin; Behinderung |
Abstract | In 2017, the Supreme Court ruled on a special education case Endrew F. v. Douglas County School District. In this important case, the High Court addressed the degree of educational benefit necessary for a school district to fulfill the requirements for a free appropriate public education (FAPE) under the Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The ruling was especially meaningful for the field of emotional and behavioral disorders, because the plaintiff in this case, Endrew F., exhibited serious academic difficulties and behavior problems. In this article, I first analyze the IDEA's definition of FAPE and the importance of addressing students' behavior problems in their individualized education programs (IEPs) to provide a FAPE. Second, I examine the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in the Endrew decision, specifically addressing the impact of the school district's failure to address a student's behaviors in his IEP. Third, I discuss the implications of the Endrew ruling for developing and implementing IEPs for students with serious behavior problems. I end by advocating for changes in the upcoming reauthorization of the IDEA to bring the law into conformity with the spirit and letter of this important ruling. (As Provided). |
Anmerkungen | SAGE Publications and Hammill Institute on Disabilities. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320. Tel: 800-818-7243; Tel: 805-499-9774; Fax: 800-583-2665; e-mail: journals@sagepub.com; Web site: http://sagepub.com |
Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |
Update | 2020/1/01 |