Prevention of Teenage Smoking through Negative Information Giving, a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial

Autor/inn/en	Thrul, Johannes; Bühler, Anneke; Herth, Felix J. F.
Titel	Prevention of Teenage Smoking through Negative Information Giving, a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial
Quelle	In: Drugs: Education, Prevention & Policy, 21 (2014) 1, S.35-42 (8 Seiten) PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	0968-7637
DOI	10.3109/09687637.2013.798264
Schlagwörter	Prevention; Adolescents; Smoking; Randomized Controlled Trials; Foreign Countries; Pretests Posttests; Intervention; At Risk Students; Student Attitudes; Secondary School Students; Grade 7; Grade 8; Grade 9; Health Promotion; Negative Attitudes; Advertising; Experimental Groups; Control Groups; Germany + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Prävention; Vorbeugung; Adolescent; Adolescence; Adoleszenz; Jugend; Jugendalter; Jugendlicher; Rauchen; Ausland; Schülerverhalten; Sekundarschüler; School year 07; 7. Schuljahr; Schuljahr 07; School year 08; 8. Schuljahr; Schuljahr 08; School year 09; 9. Schuljahr; Schuljahr 09; Gesundheitsfürsorge; Gesundheitshilfe; Reihenuntersuchung; Negative Fixierung; Werbung; Deutschland
Abstract	Aims: The objective of this study was to evaluate the preventive effect of a clinic-based, emotionally arousing, negative information giving intervention on adolescents' protective and risk factors of smoking. Methods: Data of 563 students (18 schools) from a cluster randomized controlled trial conducted in Heidelberg, Germany (2010-2011) were analysed. The intervention included a presentation about the risks of smoking, a live video session of a pulmonary endoscopy and a testimonial interview with a lung cancer patient. A prevention booklet served as the control condition. Students' reaction to the intervention was assessed after 2 weeks, risk and protective factors of smoking and smoking status were assessed after 2.5 months. Findings: The clinic intervention received significantly better ratings of credibility, personal relevance and emotional arousal than the booklet. Differences between clinic and booklet groups failed to reach significance on smoking-related threat appraisal, coping appraisal, protection motivation, behavioural intention and smoking status. Conclusions: Although the clinic intervention generated a significant immediate reaction, there were no significant preventive effects at follow-up. These results are in line with previous research and add further evidence for the ineffectiveness of emotionally arousing negative information giving in smoking prevention with adolescents. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Taylor & Francis. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 530 Walnut Street Suite 850, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Tel: 215-625-8900; Fax: 215-207-0050; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2020/1/01