Context Effects in Discourse: The Question under Discussion

Autor/inn/en	Clifton, Charles; Frazier, Lyn
Titel	Context Effects in Discourse: The Question under Discussion
Quelle	In: Discourse Processes: A multidisciplinary journal, 55 (2018) 2, S.105-112 (8 Seiten) PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Zusatzinformation	ORCID (Clifton, Charles) ORCID (Frazier, Lyn)
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	0163-853X
DOI	10.1080/0163853X.2017.1330029
Schlagwörter	Context Effect; Discourse Analysis; Discourse Modes; Questioning Techniques; Communication Skills; Communication Strategies; Communication Research; Undergraduate Students; Massachusetts + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Diskursanalyse; Diskursethik; Befragungstechnik; Fragetechnik; Kommunikationsstil; Kommunikationsstrategie; Kommunikationsforschung; Master-Studiengang
Abstract	Linguistic analyses of the Question Under Discussion (QUD) provide an interesting extension to Tony Sanford's work on discourse coherence (e.g., Sanford & Emmott, 2012). The QUD approach claims that discourse is organized by a series of overt and covert questions and answers to, or comments on, them. In a coherent discourse, material that addresses the current QUD receives focus, and its processing is facilitated. After a brief review of the existing literature showing that the QUD affects discourse processing, we describe several lines of our own published research on the QUD and briefly present two new experiments. We first review the effects of overt questions on sentence comprehension, arguing that sentences that are thematically and syntactically congruent with the bias of an overt preceding question are processed faster than ones that require a syntactic and thematic shift. We present new evidence suggesting that assertions that address the focused element of a preceding question are likely to receive an exhaustive interpretation. Turning to covert questions, we review evidence that modals and other indications of the uncertain possibility of some event introduce a QUD about the occurrence of that event, biasing and facilitating comprehension of sentences that address such a QUD. Finally, we present new evidence suggesting that although sentential assertions in a discourse are likely to be taken to address an implicit QUD introduced by the antecedent of a conditional, elliptical assertions still tend to find their antecedents in a phrase whose structure is readily available. Thus, although satisfying the requirements of the current QUD is one factor that affects discourse comprehension, it is actually just one of many. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 530 Walnut Street Suite 850, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Tel: 215-625-8900; Fax: 215-207-0050; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2020/1/01