Suche

Wo soll gesucht werden?
Erweiterte Literatursuche

Ariadne Pfad:

Inhalt

Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige

 
Autor/inn/enRobinson, Peter; Strong, Gregory; Whittle, Jennifer
TitelComparing Tasks and Skills in Developing Discussions.
Quelle(2000), (14 Seiten)
PDF als Volltext kostenfreie Datei Verfügbarkeit 
Spracheenglisch
Dokumenttypgedruckt; online; Monographie
SchlagwörterCognitive Style; College Students; English for Academic Purposes; English (Second Language); Experiential Learning; Foreign Countries; Higher Education; Individual Differences; Learning Processes; Learning Strategies; Mediation Theory; Nonverbal Communication; Second Language Instruction; Second Language Learning; Teaching Methods; Verbal Learning; Japan
AbstractDeveloping the skills necessary to participate in academic discussions is an important goal in many programs of English for academic purposes. However, there has been little empirical investigation into how verbal and nonverbal aspects of discussion abilities might be developed. This paper reports the results of a semester-long effect of instruction study at a Japanese university. Two methods of developing student discussions were employed: one, task-based, or derived from an analytic model of a syllabus design; the other, skill-based, from a more familiar synthetic syllabus. In addition, this paper also examines the interactions between learning discussion skills through task-based and skill-based approaches and measures of individual aptitude, anxiety, personality, and motivation. Research suggests a relationship between individual differences and success in language learning. Students learn discussion skills equally well under both task-based teaching models, incorporating focus-on-form activities, and traditional skills-based teaching in this study, with skills-based teaching having the slight advantage over the former. Three tables, "Operational Distinction between Task-Based and Skill-Based Approaches,""Sample Activities in the Task-Based and Skill-Based Approaches," and Rating Scale Used To Assess Oral Discussions," are included. (Contains 35 references.) (Author/KFT)
Erfasst vonERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Literaturbeschaffung und Bestandsnachweise in Bibliotheken prüfen
 

Standortunabhängige Dienste
Da keine ISBN zur Verfügung steht, konnte leider kein (weiterer) URL generiert werden.
Bitte rufen Sie die Eingabemaske des Karlsruher Virtuellen Katalogs (KVK) auf
Dort haben Sie die Möglichkeit, in zahlreichen Bibliothekskatalogen selbst zu recherchieren.
Tipps zum Auffinden elektronischer Volltexte im Video-Tutorial

Trefferlisten Einstellungen

Permalink als QR-Code

Permalink als QR-Code

Inhalt auf sozialen Plattformen teilen (nur vorhanden, wenn Javascript eingeschaltet ist)

Teile diese Seite: