Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
Institution | Far West Lab. for Educational Research and Development, San Francisco, CA. |
---|---|
Titel | Assessment Inventories, Surveys, and Templates for Evaluating Educational Technology Regional and Local Assistance Programs. Phase IV of the Comprehensive Study of Educational Technology Programs Authorized from 1984-1992. |
Quelle | (1991), (264 Seiten)
PDF als Volltext |
Sprache | englisch |
Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Monographie |
Schlagwörter | Data Collection; Educational Technology; Elementary Secondary Education; Evaluation Criteria; Evaluation Methods; Formative Evaluation; Interviews; Matrices; Measurement Techniques; Program Evaluation; Questionnaires; Records (Forms); Research Methodology; Self Evaluation (Groups); State Programs; Summative Evaluation; Surveys; Worksheets Data capture; Datensammlung; Unterrichtsmedien; Interviewing; Interviewtechnik; Matrizenrechnung; Messtechnik; Programme evaluation; Programmevaluation; Fragebogen; Formularsammlung; Research method; Forschungsmethode; Self evaluation; Group; Groups; Selbstevaluation; Gruppe (Soz); Regierungsprogramm; Survey; Umfrage; Befragung |
Abstract | This report on Phase IV, of a four-phase study, provided for the development of evaluation templates and instruments to be used by the California Department of Education to facilitate systematic assessment of state funded educational technology programs and projects. These assessment documents comprised the major data collection sources for the study and were revised as a result of their use in the study. It is intended that these documents be adapted as needed for future use. The instruments included in this report were used to evaluate: (1) School-Based Educational Technology Grants; (2) Level I Model Technology School Projects; (3) Level II Academic Model Technology School Projects; (4) Instructional Television (ITV) Regional Agencies; (5) Software Development Projects; and (6) California Technology Project (CTP) Consortia. Matrices are provided that list each of the instruments as a source of data and indicate the relative importance of the data provided by that instrument for individual evaluation questions. There is a separate matrix for each instrument corresponding to each of the six programs evaluated. Following the matrices are each of the inventories, templates, questionnaires, and interview protocols. (AEF) |
Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |