Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
Autor/inn/en | Robinson, Katie; Riley, Nicholas; Owen, Katherine B.; Drew, Ryan; Mavilidi, Myrto F.; Hillman, Charles H.; Faigenbaum, Avery D.; García-Hermoso, Antonio; Revalds Lubans, David |
---|---|
Titel | Effects of resistance training on academic outcomes in school-aged youth. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Gefälligkeitsübersetzung: Auswirkungen von Widerstandstraining auf die schulischen Leistungen von Jugendlichen im Schulalter. Eine systematische Übersicht und Meta-Analyse. |
Quelle | In: Sports medicine, 53 (2023) 11, S. 2095-2109
PDF als Volltext |
Sprache | englisch |
Dokumenttyp | online; gedruckt; Zeitschriftenaufsatz |
ISSN | 0112-1642; 1179-2035 |
DOI | 10.1007/s40279-023-01881-6 |
Schlagwörter | Metaanalyse; Kognition; Kognitive Leistung; Kognitiver Prozess; Leistungsfähigkeit; Bildungssystem; Schulalter; Regressionsanalyse; Fitness; Krafttraining; Sportmedizin; Sportphysiologie; Einflussfaktor; Leistung; Literaturübersicht; Jugendlicher |
Abstract | Background: The primary aim of our systematic review and meta-analysis was to investigate the effect of resistance training on academic outcomes in school-aged youth. Methods: We conducted a systematic search of six electronic databases (CINAHL Complete, PsycINFO, SCOPUS, Ovid MEDLINE, SPORTDiscus and EMBASE) with no date restrictions. Studies were eligible if they: (a) included school-aged youth (5-18 years), and (b) examined the effect of resistance training on academic outcomes (i.e., cognitive function, academic achievement, and/or on-task behaviour in the classroom). Risk of bias was assessed using the appropriate Cochrane Risk of Bias Tools, funnel plots and Egger's regression asymmetry tests. A structural equation modelling approach was used to conduct the meta-analysis. Results: Fifty-three studies were included in our systematic review. Participation in resistance training (ten studies with 53 effect sizes) had a small positive effect on the overall cognitive, academic and on-task behaviours in school-aged youth (standardized mean difference (SMD) 0.19, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.05-0.32). Resistance training was more effective (SMD 0.26, 95% CI 0.10-0.42) than concurrent training, i.e., the combination of resistance training and aerobic training (SMD 0.11, 95% CI - 0.05-0.28). An additional 43 studies (including 211 effect sizes) examined the association between muscular fitness and cognition or academic achievement, also yielding a positive relationship (SMD 0.13, 95% CI 0.10-0.16). Conclusion: This review provides preliminary evidence that resistance training may improve cognitive function, academic performance, and on-task behaviours in school-aged youth. (Autor). |
Erfasst von | Bundesinstitut für Sportwissenschaft, Bonn |
Update | 2024/1 |