Paradigma versus Denkstil. Modi systematischer Historiographie in der Musikpädagogik.

Autor/in	Kaiser, Hermann J.
Titel	Paradigma versus Denkstil. Modi systematischer Historiographie in der Musikpädagogik. Paralleltitel: Dimensions of historiography - paradigma versus thought-style.
Quelle	Aus: Niessen, Anne (Hrsg.); Knigge, Jens (Hrsg.): Theoretische Rahmung und Theoriebildung in der musikpädagogischen Forschung. Münster; New York: Waxmann (2015) S. 33-49 PDF als Volltext kostenfreie Datei Link als defekt meldenVerfügbarkeit
Reihe	Musikpädagogische Forschung. 36
Sprache	deutsch
Dokumenttyp	online; Sammelwerksbeitrag
ISSN	0937-3993
ISBN	978-3-8309-3313-7
URN	urn:nbn:de:0111-pedocs-126069
Schlagwörter	Pädagogische Forschung; Begriff; Denkstil; Lernen; Didaktik; Unterrichtsstruktur; Musikpädagogik; Musikunterricht; Wissenschaftsgeschichte; 20. Jahrhundert; Definition; Paradigma; Kuhn, Thomas S.
Abstract	With regard to historical developments, particularly to changes in sciences, humanities and social sciences, we are used to looking at them as rather isolated events, persons and facts. Normally they are conceived of as succeeding one another within a certain time span, which started in the past and ends somewhere in the future. I would like to propose that we conceive historical events as essentially constituted by concomitant events, facts and persons. (Perhaps one could call it a "horizontal view" or "lateral view".) Proceeding this way, one needs a criterion which brings together the diverse events, facts, and so forth, so that they can be a subject of research. In 1962 Thomas S. Kuhn suggested such a criterion, referred to as "Paradigma"; in 1935 Ludwik Fleck, a Polish author, developed the concept of "Denkstil" (thought-style). In this lecture both models are discussed with regard to their benefit for historical research in music education. (DIPF/Orig.).
Erfasst von	DIPF \| Leibniz-Institut für Bildungsforschung und Bildungsinformation, Frankfurt am Main
Update	2017/2