Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
| Autor/in | Leydesdorff, Loet |
|---|---|
| Titel | Diversity and interdisciplinarity: how can one distinguish and recombine disparity, variety, and balance? |
| Quelle | In: Scientometrics, (2018) 3, S.2113-2121
PDF als Volltext |
| Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz |
| ISSN | 0138-9130 |
| DOI | 10.1007/s11192-018-2810-y |
| Schlagwörter | Diversity; Gini; Measurement; Rao-Stirling; Balance |
| Abstract | Abstract The dilemma which remained unsolved using Rao-Stirling diversity, namely of how variety and balance can be combined into “dual concept diversity” (Stirling in SPRU electronic working paper series no. 28. http://www.sussex.ac.uk/Units/spru/publications/imprint/sewps/sewp28/sewp28.pdf, 1998, p. 48f.) can be clarified by using Nijssen et al.’s (Coenoses 13(1):33–38 1998) argument that the Gini coefficient is a perfect indicator of balance. However, the Gini coefficient is not an indicator of variety; this latter term can be operationalized independently as relative variety. The three components of diversity—variety, balance, and disparity—can thus be clearly distinguished and independently operationalized as measures varying between zero and one. The new diversity indicator ranges with more resolving power in the empirical case. |
| Erfasst von | OLC |
| Update | 2023/2/05 |
Literaturbeschaffung und Bestandsnachweise in Bibliotheken prüfen
Permalink als QR-Code
Inhalt auf sozialen Plattformen teilen (nur vorhanden, wenn Javascript eingeschaltet ist)
Teile diese Seite:
