Suche

Wo soll gesucht werden?
Erweiterte Literatursuche

Ariadne Pfad:

Inhalt

Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige

 
Autor/inYates, Brian T.
TitelStep Arounds for Common Pitfalls When Valuing Resources Used versus Resources Produced
QuelleIn: New Directions for Evaluation, (2012) 133, S.43-52 (10 Seiten)
PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit 
Spracheenglisch
Dokumenttypgedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN1097-6736
DOI10.1002/ev.20005
SchlagwörterProgram Evaluation; Cost Effectiveness; Evaluation Criteria; Evaluation Problems; Outcome Measures; Resources; Input Output Analysis; Program Costs; Error of Measurement; Human Services; Summative Evaluation; Formative Evaluation; Guidelines
AbstractThe value of a program can be understood as referring not only to outcomes, but also to how those outcomes compare to the types and amounts of resources expended to produce the outcomes. Major potential mistakes and biases in assessing the worth of resources consumed, as well as the value of outcomes produced, are explored. Most of these occur when the evaluation is limited in contexts examined or perspectives adopted. In particular, it is noted that the price of a resource often is context-dependent, and may not describe the value of a resource from important perspectives. Also, the monetary value of outcomes as inferred from earned income, and from avoided human service expenditures, may not reflect outcome value from key perspectives, possibly exacerbating discrimination according to gender, ethnicity, and age. Solutions for these problems are recommended. More complete and detailed information on resources consumed and outcomes produced also may facilitate systematic optimization of program value, if the evaluation includes the amounts and types of resources used by those program activities that change the participant processes that lead to desired program outcomes. (As Provided).
AnmerkungenWiley Periodicals, Inc. 350 Main Street, Malden, MA 02148. Tel: 800-835-6770; Tel: 781-388-8598; Fax: 781-388-8232; e-mail: cs-journals@wiley.com; Web site: http://www.wiley.com/WileyCDA
Erfasst vonERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update2017/4/10
Literaturbeschaffung und Bestandsnachweise in Bibliotheken prüfen
 

Standortunabhängige Dienste
Bibliotheken, die die Zeitschrift "New Directions for Evaluation" besitzen:
Link zur Zeitschriftendatenbank (ZDB)

Artikellieferdienst der deutschen Bibliotheken (subito):
Übernahme der Daten in das subito-Bestellformular

Tipps zum Auffinden elektronischer Volltexte im Video-Tutorial

Trefferlisten Einstellungen

Permalink als QR-Code

Permalink als QR-Code

Inhalt auf sozialen Plattformen teilen (nur vorhanden, wenn Javascript eingeschaltet ist)

Teile diese Seite: