Evaluating the Evaluator: A Case Study Illustrating Three Critical Mistakes No Evaluator Should Make

Autor/in	Lanigan, Mary L.
Titel	Evaluating the Evaluator: A Case Study Illustrating Three Critical Mistakes No Evaluator Should Make
Quelle	In: Performance Improvement, 49 (2010) 10, S.39-45 (7 Seiten) PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	1090-8811
DOI	10.1002/pfi.20184
Schlagwörter	Employees; Evaluators; Personnel Evaluation; Teacher Administrator Relationship; Job Performance; Case Studies; Employment; Surveys; Interviews; Higher Education; Educational Technology; Morale; Business Administration; Enrollment + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Employee; Arbeitnehmer; Beschäftigter; Personalbeurteilung; Work performance; Arbeitsleistung; Case study; Fallstudie; Case Study; Dienstverhältnis; Survey; Umfrage; Befragung; Interviewing; Interviewtechnik; Hochschulbildung; Hochschulsystem; Hochschulwesen; Unterrichtsmedien; Moral; Business economics; Betriebswirtschaft; Einschulung
Abstract	Most employees do not like to be evaluated because they fear the process and people involved. Although optimal performance evaluators can minimize people's anxieties about being assessed, actual performance evaluators can perpetuate employees' fears and, worse, lower their job performances and morale. A case study illustrates the actions of an actual performance evaluator and highlights the process he carries out and the report he writes. A debrief follows to show how to correct the mistakes he makes. (Contains 1 exhibit.) (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Subscription Department, 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030-5774. Tel: 800-825-7550; Tel: 201-748-6645; Fax: 201-748-6021; e-mail: subinfo@wiley.com; Web site: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/browse/?type=JOURNAL
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2017/4/10