When Does Between-Sequence Phonological Similarity Promote Irrelevant Sound Disruption?

Autor/inn/en	Marsh, John E.; Vachon, Francois; Jones, Dylan M.
Titel	When Does Between-Sequence Phonological Similarity Promote Irrelevant Sound Disruption?
Quelle	In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34 (2008) 1, S.243-248 (6 Seiten) PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	0278-7393
Schlagwörter	Auditory Stimuli; Recall (Psychology); Phonological Awareness; Cues; Cognitive Processes; Theories + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Auditive Stimulation; Abberufung; Stichwort; Cognitive process; Kognitiver Prozess; Theory; Theorie
Abstract	Typically, the phonological similarity between to-be-recalled items and TBI auditory stimuli has no impact if recall in serial order is required. However, in the present study, the authors have shown that the free recall, but not serial recall, of lists of phonologically related to-be-remembered items was disrupted by an irrelevant sound stream (end rhymes) sharing similar phonological content. These findings can be explained by the notion that between-sequence phonological similarity effects emerge when category-cueing processes become an important determinant for recall, such as when shared category information can be used as a retrieval aid to cue list items or plausible list candidates. In this case, the presence of categorically similar irrelevant items impairs the retrieval of list items and leads to intrusion error. Implications of these results for theories of auditory distraction are discussed. (Author).
Anmerkungen	American Psychological Association. Journals Department, 750 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20002-4242. Tel: 800-374-2721; Tel: 202-336-5510; Fax: 202-336-5502; e-mail: order@apa.org; Web site: http://www.apa.org/publications
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2017/4/10