Outcome Measures for Economic Evaluations and Cost-Effectiveness Analyses of Interventions for People with Intellectual Disabilities: A Methodological Systematic Review

Autor/inn/en	Benedetto, Valerio; Filipe, Luis; Harris, Catherine; Tahir, Naheed; Doherty, Alison; Clegg, Andrew
Titel	Outcome Measures for Economic Evaluations and Cost-Effectiveness Analyses of Interventions for People with Intellectual Disabilities: A Methodological Systematic Review
Quelle	In: Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 36 (2023) 2, S.230-240 (11 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Zusatzinformation	ORCID (Benedetto, Valerio) ORCID (Filipe, Luis) ORCID (Harris, Catherine) ORCID (Tahir, Naheed) ORCID (Doherty, Alison) ORCID (Clegg, Andrew)
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	1360-2322
DOI	10.1111/jar.13056
Schlagwörter	Program Evaluation; Cost Effectiveness; Program Costs; Intervention; Intellectual Disability; Literature Reviews; Economic Factors; Evaluation Methods + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Programme evaluation; Programmevaluation; Kosten-Nutzen-Analyse; Kosten-Nutzen-Denken; Intellect; Disability; Disabilities; Verstand; Behinderung; Ökonomischer Faktor
Abstract	Background: Mainstream economic evaluations methods may not be appropriate to capture the range of effects triggered by interventions for people with intellectual disabilities. In this systematic review, we aimed to identify, assess and synthesise the arguments in the literature on how the effects of interventions for people with intellectual disabilities could be measured in economic evaluations. Method: We searched for studies providing relevant arguments by running multi-database, backward, forward citation and grey literature searches. Following title/abstract and full-text screening, the arguments extracted from the included studies were summarised and qualitatively assessed in a narrative synthesis. Results: Our final analysis included three studies, with their arguments summarised in different methodological areas. Conclusions: Based on the evidence, we suggest the use of techniques more attuned to the population with intellectual disabilities, such sensitive preference-based instruments to collect health states data, and mapping algorithms to obtain utility values. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Wiley. Available from: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030. Tel: 800-835-6770; e-mail: cs-journals@wiley.com; Web site: https://www.wiley.com/en-us
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2024/1/01