Can Interculturalism Complement Multiculturalism?

Autor/in	Modood, Tariq
Titel	Can Interculturalism Complement Multiculturalism?
Quelle	In: Multicultural Education Review, 13 (2021) 4, S.275-284 (10 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Zusatzinformation	ORCID (Modood, Tariq)
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	2005-615X
DOI	10.1080/2005615X.2021.2006115
Schlagwörter	Cultural Awareness; Multicultural Education; Criticism; Educational History; Political Attitudes; Diversity; International Organizations; Foreign Countries; Ethnic Groups; Religious Cultural Groups; Self Concept; Nationalism; Cultural Pluralism; Intercultural Communication; Europe + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Cultural identity; Kulturelle Identität; Multikulturelle Erziehung; Kritik; History of education; Bildungsgeschichte; Political attitude; Politische Einstellung; International organisation; International organisations; International organization; Internationale Organisation; Ausland; Ethnie; Kirchliche Gruppe; Religionszugehörigkeit; Selbstkonzept; Nationalismus; Kulturpluralismus; Interkulturelle Kommunikation; Europa
Abstract	European/UNESCO interculturalism (IC) emerged as a critique of multiculturalism (MC) (complicated by the fact that there is an alternative interculturalism, not discussed here). I suggest that this relationship has gone through three phases. "Phase one" begins in the 1990s with a general dissatisfaction with MC from many political and intellectual sources. "Phase two," roughly from about the middle of the last decade, is when IC scholars, mainly sociologists, though also in cultural studies, policy studies, migration studies, geography as well as education emerge in significant numbers. The engagement with multiculturalism is limited and serves the purpose of clearing the ground in order to get on with a new research approach and then getting on with it. "Phase three" is the political theory justification of IC. I argue that these three phases have not established a pro-diversity 'ism' which can replace MC. While I hope we may move on to a "phase four," where MC and IC are seen to be complementary, I here re-state what I think are the key concepts of MC. I hope it will be evident that firstly, that these concepts are not out of date or redundant; and secondly, therefore, that IC is wrong to abandon them. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 530 Walnut Street Suite 850, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Tel: 215-625-8900; Fax: 215-207-0050; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2024/1/01