The 2014 Special Educational Needs and Disability Code of Practice: Old Ideology into New Policy Contexts?

Autor/inn/en	Hodkinson, Alan; Burch, Leah
Titel	The 2014 Special Educational Needs and Disability Code of Practice: Old Ideology into New Policy Contexts?
Quelle	In: Journal of Education Policy, 34 (2019) 2, S.155-173 (19 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Zusatzinformation	ORCID (Hodkinson, Alan)
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	0268-0939
DOI	10.1080/02680939.2017.1412501
Schlagwörter	Special Education; Educational Needs; Disabilities; Ideology; Social Justice; Discourse Analysis; Work Ethic; Human Body; Educational Policy; Foreign Countries; Special Needs Students; Federal Programs; Federal Legislation; Standards; Neoliberalism; Independent Living; Employment Potential; United Kingdom + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Special needs education; Sonderpädagogik; Sonderschulwesen; Educational need; Bildungsbedarf; Handicap; Behinderung; Ideologie; Soziale Gerechtigkeit; Diskursanalyse; Arbeitsethos; Menschlicher Körper; Politics of education; Bildungspolitik; Ausland; Sonderpädagogischer Förderbedarf; Bundesrecht; Standard; Neo-liberalism; Neoliberalismus; Selbstverantwortung; Arbeitsmarktbezogene Qualifikation; Beschäftigungsfähigkeit; Großbritannien
Abstract	This article reveals the Foucauldian docile body manufactured within the Department for Education's special educational needs and disability code of practice 2014 through employment of a theoretical lens of embodiment and an analytical focus on only three words. In problematizing the concepts of support, employment and independence, we seek to upend this docile body juxtaposing such against the active 'non-productive' disabled body. We conclude that the Code is riven with ideological assumptions which act as a constraint to the location, form and function of the body. Everybody's body is sorted and graded according to its ability to fulfil a Conservative work ethic and contribute positively to a society in which bodies are not equally valued. The authors suggest that critical discourse analysis, informed by the outlined conceptualisation of embodiment, could be usefully applied in the critiquing of many policy and guidance documents. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 530 Walnut Street Suite 850, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Tel: 215-625-8900; Fax: 215-207-0050; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2020/1/01