Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
Autor/inn/en | Christiansen, Michael A.; Lambert, Alyssia M.; Nadelson, Louis S.; Dupree, Kami M.; Kingsford, Trish A. |
---|---|
Titel | In-Class Versus At-Home Quizzes: Which Is Better? A Flipped Learning Study in a Two-Site Synchronously Broadcast Organic Chemistry Course |
Quelle | In: Journal of Chemical Education, 94 (2017) 2, S.157-163 (7 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift
PDF als Volltext |
Zusatzinformation | ORCID (Christiansen, Michael A.) |
Sprache | englisch |
Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz |
ISSN | 0021-9584 |
DOI | 10.1021/acs.jchemed.6b00370 |
Schlagwörter | Science Instruction; Homework; Video Technology; Educational Technology; Technology Uses in Education; Organic Chemistry; Tests; Learner Engagement; Scores; Teaching Methods; College Science; Undergraduate Study; Cooperative Learning; Cognitive Processes; Memory; Statistical Analysis; Utah Teaching of science; Science education; Natural sciences Lessons; Naturwissenschaftlicher Unterricht; Hausaufgabe; Unterrichtsmedien; Technology enhanced learning; Technology aided learning; Technologieunterstütztes Lernen; Organische Chemie; Examination; Prüfung; Examen; Teaching method; Lehrmethode; Unterrichtsmethode; Grundstudium; Kooperatives Lernen; Cognitive process; Kognitiver Prozess; Gedächtnis; Statistische Analyse |
Abstract | We recently shared our design of a two semester flipped organic chemistry course in which we gave students in-class quizzes to incentivize attendance and watching the lecture videos in advance. With a second iteration, we planned to make the video-watching experience more engaging. We accordingly hypothesized that if students completed short at-home quizzes while watching the videos, then attentiveness, engagement, and learning would increase. We tested this with a later section of the course, dividing the material into 13 units. For units 1-6, we gave in-class quizzes; for 7-13, quizzes were at home. Although units 1-6 and 7-13 covered different material, we were nonetheless surprised when students' average quiz scores decreased for the take-home quizzes because they did not have a time limit and were open-book, unlike the in-class quizzes. Anonymous survey feedback showed a strong preference for quizzes in class and indications that take-home quizzes demotivated attendance and preclass watching of the videos. Thus, for analogous flipped-course designs in chemistry, we recommend an in-class quizzing strategy over take-home quizzes to positively affect engagement, learning, and attendance. Of note, this course was synchronously delivered to two groups of students at geographically distinct satellite locations. (As Provided). |
Anmerkungen | Division of Chemical Education, Inc and ACS Publications Division of the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street NW, Washington, DC 20036. Tel: 800-227-5558; Tel: 202-872-4600; e-mail: eic@jce.acs.org; Web site: http://pubs.acs.org/jchemeduc |
Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |
Update | 2020/1/01 |