Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
Autor/in | Pang, May |
---|---|
Titel | Companion Guides for Lesson Planning: A Planning Template and the Lesson Plan Pro Forma |
Quelle | In: ELT Journal, 70 (2016) 4, S.444-454 (11 Seiten)
PDF als Volltext |
Sprache | englisch |
Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz |
ISSN | 0951-0893 |
DOI | 10.1093/elt/ccw053 |
Schlagwörter | Guides; Lesson Plans; Models; Affordances; Curriculum Development; Scaffolding (Teaching Technique); Teacher Education; English Language Learners; Second Language Instruction; Abstract Reasoning; Decision Making; Writing Processes |
Abstract | Jason Anderson's proposal, in "ELT Journal" (2015), for an affordance-based approach to lesson planning raises important issues in teacher education. However, his arguments against the role of planned outcomes in favour of an affordance-based focus using learning opportunities as units of planning fail to acknowledge the complexities involved and teachers' needs in mastering this essential task. By way of response, in this article I first echo the legitimate concerns raised in Anderson's paper about lesson planning, then follow with a critical analysis of three fundamental issues of curriculum planning which reflect fallacies in his core argument. Then, based on a holistic perspective, I propose scaffolding lesson planning in teacher training, using the companion guides of a planning template and the lesson plan pro forma. Practical suggestions are also made for a three-level planning model for EFL/ESL practice with the support of a generic lesson plan incorporating examples of reasoning and ways of representing the decisions made during the plan writing process. (As Provided). |
Anmerkungen | Oxford University Press. Great Clarendon Street, Oxford, OX2 6DP, UK. Tel: +44-1865-353907; Fax: +44-1865-353485; e-mail: jnls.cust.serv@oxfordjournals.org; Web site: http://eltj.oxfordjournals.org/ |
Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |
Update | 2020/1/01 |