Administrative Experiments: Unlocking What Works Better and What Works for Whom

Autor/inn/en	Cody, Scott; Perez-Johnson, Irma; Joyce, Kristen
Titel	Administrative Experiments: Unlocking What Works Better and What Works for Whom
Quelle	In: American Journal of Evaluation, 36 (2015) 4, S.547-557 (11 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	1098-2140
DOI	10.1177/1098214015600784
Schlagwörter	Administrative Organization; Experiments; Data; Veterans; Employment Services; Intervention + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Erprobung; Daten; Kriegsteilnehmer; Veteran; Employment service; Arbeitsvermittlung
Abstract	Administrative experiments are increasingly available for public programs with high-quality administrative data to identify what changes make programs and services more effective. Program administrators can run short-term experiments to test improvements in programs and have causally valid impact estimates within a year. Administrative experiments also can be used to better understand what works for whom by testing program improvements on key subpopulations of program participants. This article provides an overview of rapid cycle evaluation, describes its use in identifying what works best for whom, and provides an illustrative example of how the techniques could be applied to the veterans' employment services area. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	SAGE Publications. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320. Tel: 800-818-7243; Tel: 805-499-9774; Fax: 800-583-2665; e-mail: journals@sagepub.com; Web site: http://sagepub.com
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2020/1/01