Suche

Wo soll gesucht werden?
Erweiterte Literatursuche

Ariadne Pfad:

Inhalt

Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige

 
Autor/inn/enDe Backer, Liesje; Van Keer, Hilde; Valcke, Martin
TitelSocially Shared Metacognitive Regulation during Reciprocal Peer Tutoring: Identifying Its Relationship with Students' Content Processing and Transactive Discussions
QuelleIn: Instructional Science: An International Journal of the Learning Sciences, 43 (2015) 3, S.323-344 (22 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift
PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit 
Spracheenglisch
Dokumenttypgedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN0020-4277
DOI10.1007/s11251-014-9335-4
SchlagwörterPeer Teaching; Tutoring; Metacognition; Cooperative Learning; Learning Processes; Higher Education; Learning Strategies; Group Discussion; Questioning Techniques; Discourse Analysis; Regression (Statistics); Correlation; Interpersonal Communication
AbstractAlthough successful collaborative learning requires socially shared metacognitive regulation (SSMR) of the learning process among multiple students, empirical research on SSMR is limited. The present study contributes to the emerging research on SSMR by examining its correlation with both collaborative learners' content processing strategies and the level of transactivity in their discussions. The study is, more specifically, conducted in an authentic higher education reciprocal peer tutoring (RPT) setting. All sessions of a semester-long RPT-intervention of five randomly selected RPT-groups were videotaped (70 h of video recordings). Literature-based coding instruments were developed to analyse RPT-groups' SSMR, content processing strategies (i.e., questioning and explaining), cognitively-oriented and metacognitively-oriented transactive discussions. In order to examine how RPT-groups' SSMR is related to their content processing and transactive discussions, binary logistic regression analyses were conducted. The results indicate that both questioning and explaining are positively associated with SSMR. Especially deep content processing shows a strong relationship. Further, both cognitively-oriented and metacognitively-oriented transactive discussions significantly increase the probability of RPT-groups engaging in SSMR. More specifically, transactive discussions in which RPT-participants elaboratively operate on each other's metacognitive regulation appear to be conducive. In contrast, non-transactive discussions are not significantly associated with SSMR. (As Provided).
AnmerkungenSpringer. 233 Spring Street, New York, NY 10013. Tel: 800-777-4643; Tel: 212-460-1500; Fax: 212-348-4505; e-mail: service-ny@springer.com; Web site: http://www.springerlink.com
Erfasst vonERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update2020/1/01
Literaturbeschaffung und Bestandsnachweise in Bibliotheken prüfen
 

Standortunabhängige Dienste
Bibliotheken, die die Zeitschrift "Instructional Science: An International Journal of the Learning Sciences" besitzen:
Link zur Zeitschriftendatenbank (ZDB)

Artikellieferdienst der deutschen Bibliotheken (subito):
Übernahme der Daten in das subito-Bestellformular

Tipps zum Auffinden elektronischer Volltexte im Video-Tutorial

Trefferlisten Einstellungen

Permalink als QR-Code

Permalink als QR-Code

Inhalt auf sozialen Plattformen teilen (nur vorhanden, wenn Javascript eingeschaltet ist)

Teile diese Seite: