Faculty Evaluation: Part 1. Collective Bargaining Perspectives, Volume 3, Number 1.

Sonst. Personen	Goodwin, Harold I. (Hrsg.)
Institution	West Virginia Univ., Morgantown. Dept. of Educational Administration.
Titel	Faculty Evaluation: Part 1. Collective Bargaining Perspectives, Volume 3, Number 1.
Quelle	(1978), (5 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift Verfügbarkeit
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
Schlagwörter	Collective Bargaining; College Faculty; Contracts; Evaluation Methods; Faculty Evaluation; Higher Education; Negotiation Agreements; Performance Contracts; Performance Criteria + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Tarifverhandlung; Fakultät; Vertrag; Hochschulbildung; Hochschulsystem; Hochschulwesen; Abkommen; Leistungsvereinbarung
Abstract	Statements on faculty evaluation contained in higher education collective bargaining agreements may simply be a new ritual. It is difficult to read the agreement materials without concluding that they do not preclude a wide latitude of interpretation. Statements of standards against which to make uniform or equitable judgments do not exist. In part this may be related to a previous observation that, having demanded specific criteria against which to make evaluative judgments, unions reject the evaluation conclusions if they do not agree with them. Since judgments on salary, promotions, tenure, dismissal, and retrenchment are crucial to the faculty and to the quality of the institution, the present objective state of faculty evaluation is regarded as inadequate. (Author/MSE)
Anmerkungen	Department of Educational Administration, College of Human Resources and Education, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia 26506
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2004/1/01